Week 3 Blog Assignment: Communicating Effectively
Modalities
After reviewing these
different modalities, I see why communication is so important. Dr. Stolovitch
states in the video “Communicating with Stakeholders,” communication should be
clear, concise, and focused. Communication helps everyone to stay on target.
Effective communication should be influenced by (1) spirit and attitude, (2)
tonality and body language, (3) timing, and (4) personality of the recipient
(Stolovitch, 2012).
The email modality
that was demonstrated is very respectful and to the point. Jane stated in her email
what type of situation she was in and included a solution to the problem. Her
tone of the email was business friendly and respectful. By using the email
modality is we can also keep a copy in our “sent” email box or even print a
copy with the date and time as Dr. Stolovitch mentions we should always keep
documentation of our work in case a problem arises (Stolovitch, 2012).
Voice Mail
The voice mail was somewhat more telling of Jane’s
state of mind; however, the urgency of her need was less apparent. In the voice
mail, Jane’s matter of fact, even somewhat condescending tone gave me the
impression that she really was only interested in getting Mark to do what she
wanted even more so than getting the actual data from the report.
Face-to-Face
The
face-to-face version was effective at conveying Jane’s need for the report and
her concern that Mark’s tardiness in delivering it was causing her anxiety
because of the threat it posed to her own deadline. In the face-to-face, Jane
presented matter-of-factly and clearly, in both tone and body language, but she
also demonstrated warmth and cooperation.
It was these characteristics that were missing in the email and voice
mail modalities. The only problem with the face-to-face is that Jane must have
known what little time Mark had available and she used that to her advantage. This
in turn could have made Mark less receptive, simply because he was too hurried
to give her his full attention.
The voice
mail was least effective, in my opinion, because of its somewhat condescending
and demanding tone. Even the most congenial and cooperative colleague can have
too much on their plate at any given time to respond immediately to another
demand.
Implications
Dr.
Stolovich also suggests that “important information should first be conveyed
face-to-face with all the stakeholders present”. I have to agree with
this. When introducing a new project, it
is important to have a face to face meeting so that everyone can put a face
with a name, as well as get the same information about the new project. After
this initial meeting, emails could be sent reviewing what was discussed at the
face to face meeting.
Dr. Vince Budrovich mentions that it is important to “tailor your
communication strategy to fit the need of the stakeholder.” I think this is an important process to
implement. Everyone learns and
communicates differently. As an
Instructional Designer, it is my job to fit the needs of the client. If my
client would like a 5 minute daily briefing, I would schedule that into my
daily appointments.
References
Laureate
Education, Inc. (2010). [Video]. “Communicating with Stakeholders”
Laureate
Education, Inc. (2010). [Video]. "Practitioner Voices: Strategies for Working
with Stakeholders"
Hi Karen,
ReplyDeleteYou point out the benefit of sending e-mails - the paper trail it leaves for documentation of the communication that have gone on. I think this is especially important in a project - let's say the project we discussed this week. If Carol and Dan had e-mailed more or documented in an e-mail what their face-to-face conversations detailed. This could've been used to bring a supervisor in to remedy the situation and hold Dan accountable.
Johanna